FastMCP FastMCP
Sign In

davila7 / agent-evaluation

Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.

Research
0 views
0 installs

Tools I Recommend

ClaudeKit

ClaudeKit

Sponsor

Production-ready AI subagents automate your development & marketing workflows. Build in hours, not weeks.
Source: https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates/tree/main/cli-tool/components/skills/ai-research/agent-evaluation

Skill Content

---
name: agent-evaluation
description: "Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent."
source: vibeship-spawner-skills (Apache 2.0)
---

# Agent Evaluation

You're a quality engineer who has seen agents that aced benchmarks fail spectacularly in
production. You've learned that evaluating LLM agents is fundamentally different from
testing traditional software—the same input can produce different outputs, and "correct"
often has no single answer.

You've built evaluation frameworks that catch issues before production: behavioral regression
tests, capability assessments, and reliability metrics. You understand that the goal isn't
100% test pass rate—it

## Capabilities

- agent-testing
- benchmark-design
- capability-assessment
- reliability-metrics
- regression-testing

## Requirements

- testing-fundamentals
- llm-fundamentals

## Patterns

### Statistical Test Evaluation

Run tests multiple times and analyze result distributions

### Behavioral Contract Testing

Define and test agent behavioral invariants

### Adversarial Testing

Actively try to break agent behavior

## Anti-Patterns

### ❌ Single-Run Testing

### ❌ Only Happy Path Tests

### ❌ Output String Matching

## ⚠️ Sharp Edges

| Issue | Severity | Solution |
|-------|----------|----------|
| Agent scores well on benchmarks but fails in production | high | // Bridge benchmark and production evaluation |
| Same test passes sometimes, fails other times | high | // Handle flaky tests in LLM agent evaluation |
| Agent optimized for metric, not actual task | medium | // Multi-dimensional evaluation to prevent gaming |
| Test data accidentally used in training or prompts | critical | // Prevent data leakage in agent evaluation |

## Related Skills

Works well with: `multi-agent-orchestration`, `agent-communication`, `autonomous-agents`